User Tools

Site Tools


integration:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
integration:start [2018/06/13 10:30]
tjotov
integration:start [2018/06/14 12:41]
tjotov [Other topics]
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== No-code integration ====== ====== No-code integration ======
 ===== Overview ===== ===== Overview =====
-ADUCID offers No—code integration as default authentication method. It is implemented a set of modules including Apache web server and ADUCID core components. As result, target application receives user login name in http header (e.g. REMOTE_USER).+ADUCID offers No—code integration as default integration method. It is implemented a set of modules including Apache web server and ADUCID core components. As result, target application receives user login name in http header (e.g. REMOTE_USER).
 Many applications support header authentication by default or have authentication module available or can be easily modified to user header authentication. Many applications support header authentication by default or have authentication module available or can be easily modified to user header authentication.
  
Line 34: Line 34:
   * [[integration:transactions|Transaction support for No-Code]]   * [[integration:transactions|Transaction support for No-Code]]
   * [[integration:applications|Applications tested with ADUCID No-code integration yet]]   * [[integration:applications|Applications tested with ADUCID No-code integration yet]]
 +  * [[integration:authorization|Authorization in No-code]]
 +  * [[integration:binder|ADUCID Binder]]